PGIM India Corporate Bond Fund - Growth
Invest Now
Fund Manager: Puneet Pal, Akhil Dhar |
Debt: Corporate Bond |
CRISIL Corporate Debt A-II Index
NAV as on 12-06-2026
AUM as on
Rtn ( Since Inception )
6.64%
Inception Date
Jan 21, 2003
Expense Ratio
1.0%
Fund Status
Open Ended Schemes
Min. Investment
5,000
Min. Topup
1,000
Min. SIP Amount
1000
Risk Status
moderate
Investment Objective : The investment objective of the Scheme is to seek to generate income and capital appreciation by predominantly investing in AA+ and above rated corporate bonds. However, there can be no assurance that the investment objective of the Scheme will be achieved. The Scheme does not guarantee/indicate any returns.
Returns (%)
| 3 Mon | 6 Mon | 1 Yr | 3 Yrs | 5 Yrs | 10 Yrs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fund | 1.18 | 1.87 | 4.05 | 6.49 | 5.57 | 6.3 |
| NIFTY COMPOSITE G-SEC INDEX | 0.27 | 1.16 | 1.97 | 6.77 | 5.88 | 0.0 |
| Debt: Corporate Bond | 1.31 | 2.18 | 4.6 | 6.91 | 5.85 | 6.88 |
| Rank within Category | 14 | 20 | 19 | 19 | 16 | 11 |
| Number of Funds within Category | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 19 | 13 |
Peer Comparison
| Return (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scheme Name | AUM (crore) |
Expense Ratio |
1 Yr | 3 Yrs | 5 Yrs | 10 Yrs |
| PGIM India Corporate Bond Fund - Growth | 85.46 | 1 | 4.05 | 6.49 | 5.57 | 6.3 |
Yearly Performance (%)
Historical Returns (%)
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fund | 8.98 | 4.64 | 4.29 | 8.95 | 9.59 | 4.07 | 3.1 | 6.41 | 7.61 | 1.59 |
Returns Calculator
Growth of 10000 In SIP (Fund vs Benchmark)
Growth of 10000 In LUMPSUM (Fund vs Benchmark)
Rolling Returns
Rolling returns are the annualized returns of the scheme taken for a specified period (rolling returns period) on every day/week/month and taken till the last day of the duration. In this chart we are showing the annualized returns over the rolling returns period on every day from the start date and comparing it with the benchmark. Rolling returns is the best measure of a fund's performance. Trailing returns have a recency bias and point to point returns are specific to the period in consideration. Rolling returns, on the other hand, measures the fund's absolute and relative performance across all timescales, without bias.
Riskometer
Asset Allocation
Top 10 Holdings
| Company | Instrument | Credit Rating | Holdings (%) |
|---|